Brown v. Mid-America Packaging/Gaylord Container

49 F. App'x 90
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·Decided October 25, 2002·No. 02-1869·Unpublished

Opinion

*91 PER CURIAM.

Willie J. Brown appeals the district court’s 1 entry of judgment on a jury verdict in his action against his former employer Mid-America Packaging/Gaylord Container (Gaylord) under the Family and Medical Leave Act. We decline to review the arguments Brown raises on appeal, because they are based on theories he did not pursue at trial. See Baas v. Hoye, 766 F.2d 1190, 1194 (8th Cir.1985) (where plaintiff submits no jury instructions on issues allegedly raised by pleadings and fails to except to failure of district court to so charge, these issues cannot be considered on appeal; this court must determine what theories of recovery were actually submitted to jury).

Accordingly, we affirm. See 8th Cir. R. 47B.

A true copy.

1

. The Honorable William R. Wilson, Jr., United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Mid-America Packaging/Gaylord Container, 49 F. App'x 90 (8th Cir. 2002).

49 F. App'x 90 (Brown v. Mid-America Packaging/Gaylord Container) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Baas v. Hoye
766 F.2d 1190 (Eighth Circuit, 1985)