Brown v. Mickelson

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. Mickelson

264 S.W.3d 656, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 990, 2008 WL 2884924

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedJuly 29, 2008

DocketWD 68961

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 264 S.W.3d 656 (Brown v. Mickelson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Mickelson, 264 S.W.3d 656, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 990, 2008 WL 2884924 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Guy Benny Brown (“Brown”) appeals the denial of his motion for an award of attorneys’ fees in his action for breach of contract and to quiet title. The contract did not provide for an award of attorneys’ fees and Brown cannot point to an exception under which such an award would be appropriate. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion seeking attorneys’ fees. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Guy Benny Brown (“Brown”) appeals the denial of his motion for an award of attorneys’ fees in his action for breach of contract and to quiet title. The contract did not provide for an award of attorneys’ fees and Brown cannot point to an exception under which such an award would be appropriate. The trial court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion seeking attorneys’ fees. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

264 S.W.3d 656, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 990, 2008 WL 2884924, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-mickelson-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack