Brown v. Metts

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 9, 2003
• Docket: 02-7573
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-7573

FREDERICK BROWN,

Plaintiff - Appellant,

versus

JAMES R. METTS, Sheriff; CAPTAIN WILLIAMS; MAJOR HARRIS; EMSA CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CARE SERVICES; ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,

Defendants - Appellees.

No. 02-7775

JAMES R. METTS, Sheriff; CAPTAIN WILLIAMS; MAJOR HARRIS; EMSA CORRECTIONAL MEDICAL CARE SERVICES; ARAMARK CORRECTIONAL SERVICES,

Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Matthew J. Perry, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-99-1040-3-10BC) Submitted: March 24, 2003 Decided: April 9, 2003

Before MICHAEL, TRAXLER, and KING, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Frederick Brown, Appellant Pro Se. James Miller Davis, Jr., DAVIDSON, MORRISON & LINDEMANN, P.A., Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:

Frederick Brown appeals the district court’s orders accepting

the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on

his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2000) complaint and denying reconsideration

of that order. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm both orders for the reasons stated

by the district court. See Brown v. Metts, No. CA-99-1040-3-10BC

(D.S.C. Oct. 4 & 31, 2002). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED