Brown v. Metro-North Fire Protection District

546 U.S. 1013, 126 S. Ct. 653, 163 L. Ed. 2d 524, 74 U.S.L.W. 3302, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 8535
Supreme Court of the United States·Decided November 14, 2005·No. No. 05-6229·Published

Opinion

Ct. App. Mo., Eastern Dist. Motion of petitioner for leave to proceed in forma pauperis denied, and certiorari dismissed. See this Court’s Rule 39.8. As petitioner has repeatedly abused this Court’s process, the Clerk is directed not to accept any further petitions in noncriminal matters from peti[1014]*1014tioner unless the docketing fee required by Rule 38(a) is paid and the petition is submitted in compliance with Rule 33.1. See Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals, 506 U. S. 1 (1992) (per curiam).

Justice Stevens dissents.

See id,., at 4, and cases cited therein.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Metro-North Fire Protection District, 546 U.S. 1013, 126 S. Ct. 653, 163 L. Ed. 2d 524, 74 U.S.L.W. 3302, 2005 U.S. LEXIS 8535 (2005).

546 U.S. 1013 (Brown v. Metro-North Fire Protection District) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Martin v. District of Columbia Court of Appeals
506 U.S. 1 (Supreme Court, 1992)