Brown v. Mays
Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT
No. 96-10455 Conference Calendar
ALFRONZO BROWN,
Plaintiff-Appellant,
versus
RICHARD MAYS, Judge,
Defendant-Appellee.
- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of Texas USDC No. 3:96-CV-346-D - - - - - - - - - - June 27, 1996 Before HIGGINBOTHAM, BARKSDALE, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:*
Alfronzo Brown, Texas prisoner #627935, appeals the
dismissal of his civil rights suit pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(d). Brown argues that the defendant is not entitled to
absolute judicial immunity. We have reviewed the record and
Brown’s brief and find no reversible error in the reasoning
adopted by the district court. Brown v. Mays, No. 3:96-CV-346-D
(N.D. Tex. Nov. 29, 1995). Further, we find that Brown’s appeal
* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 96-10455 - 2 -
is frivolous, and accordingly, we DISMISS it pursuant to 5th Cir.
R. 42.2.
We caution Brown that any additional frivolous appeals filed
by him will invite the imposition of sanctions. To avoid
sanctions, Brown is further cautioned to review any pending
appeals to ensure that they do not raise arguments that are
frivolous because they have been previously decided by this
court.
APPEAL DISMISSED. SANCTION WARNING ISSUED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Mays (Brown v. Mays) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.