Brown v. Matthews

1 Va. 461, 1 Rand. 462
Supreme Court of Virginia·Decided May 15, 1823·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

May 22.

Judge Brooke,

delivered the opinion of the court:

The court is of opinion, that if the bond was such a bond as seemed to be supposed by the bar, the objections taken to it, would not avail. But the bond in the record, is a certiorari bond, and not an appeal bond. If objected to in the court of chancery, that court would not have finally dismissed the appeal. The taking an improper bond, being the mistake of its clerk, the most it could do, would be to dismiss it nisi, or to lay the party under a rule to give a proper bond in a reasonable time. In this court, the objection comes too late. The appellant Brown, who was the appellee in the court of chancery, having not only omitted to make the objection there, but by putting in a plea, admitted that the appeal was regularly before that court. On the merits, the court is of opinion to ailim the decree.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Matthews, 1 Va. 461, 1 Rand. 462 (Va. 1823).

1 Va. 461 (Brown v. Matthews) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Harris v. Harrington
22 S.E.2d 13 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1942)
Trust Co. v. Fletcher
148 S.E. 785 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1929)
Virginia Fire & Marine Ins. v. New York Carousal Manufacturing Co.
40 L.R.A. 237 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1898)
Pugh's ex'or v. Jones
6 Va. 299 (Supreme Court of Virginia, 1835)
Deen v. Hemphill
7 F. Cas. 350 (Supreme Court of Arkansas, 1831)