Brown v. Massengill

425 F. App'x 254
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided April 27, 2011·No. No. 11-6286·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Vincent Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have [255]*255reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Massengill, No. 1:10-cv-00385-LMBJFA (E.D.Va. Feb. 16, 2011). We deny Brown’s motions for appointment of counsel, for a transcript at Government expense, and for reconsideration of the initial deferral of those motions. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Massengill, 425 F. App'x 254 (4th Cir. 2011).

425 F. App'x 254 (Brown v. Massengill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brown v. Massengill
181 L. Ed. 2d 72 (Supreme Court, 2011)