Brown v. Maryland Parole Commission

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Maryland Parole Commission

540 F. App'x 209

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided September 30, 2013·No. No. 13-6357·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald Ray Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown, v. Maryland Parole Comm’n, No. 1:13-cv-00481-CCB (D.Md. Feb. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Donald Ray Brown appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown, v. Maryland Parole Comm’n, No. 1:13-cv-00481-CCB (D.Md. Feb. 25, 2013). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brown v. Maryland Parole Commission, 540 F. App'x 209 (4th Cir. 2013).

Pincite

540 F. App'x 209 (Brown v. Maryland Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related