Brown v. Mansukhani

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Mansukhani

621 F. App'x 200

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 22, 2015·No. No. 15-6841·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER ' CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Benjamin Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Mansukhani, No. 9:14-cv-01355-MGL, 2015 WL 2452768 (D.S.C. May 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER ' CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

William Benjamin Brown, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in forma pauperis, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Brown v. Mansukhani, No. 9:14-cv-01355-MGL, 2015 WL 2452768 (D.S.C. May 22, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brown v. Mansukhani, 621 F. App'x 200 (4th Cir. 2015).

Pincite

621 F. App'x 200 (Brown v. Mansukhani) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related