Brown v. Malledy

Illinois Supreme Court

Brown v. Malledy

19 Ill. 290

DecidedDecember 15, 1857

StatusPublished

This text of 19 Ill. 290 (Brown v. Malledy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Malledy, 19 Ill. 290 (Ill. 1857).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

It has been so often decided by this court, that when a plaintiff takes a voluntary non-suit in the court below, he cannot assign error upon the record, that it must be considered the settled law of the court. When the party has voluntarily retired from the court with his cause, there is nothing remaining to be acted upon by this court.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

It has been so often decided by this court, that when a plaintiff takes a voluntary non-suit in the court below, he cannot assign error upon the record, that it must be considered the settled law of the court. When the party has voluntarily retired from the court with his cause, there is nothing remaining to be acted upon by this court.

The judgment must be affirmed.

Judgment affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 Ill. 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-malledy-ill-1857.