Brown v. Maass
This text of 840 P.2d 1393 (Brown v. Maass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Petitioner petitions for Supreme Court review. We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, allow it and reverse the judgment.
Petitioner’s petition for post-conviction relief was dismissed by the trial court, because it was not timely filed under ORS 138.510(2)(b). We affirmed that judgment, because the petition for post-conviction relief was filed more than 120 days after the time limit in ORS 138.510(2)(b) became effective. We were held to be wrong in doing that. Boone v. Wright, 314 Or 135, 836 P2d 727 (1992).
Reconsideration allowed; decision withdrawn; reversed and remanded for further proceedings.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
840 P.2d 1393, 116 Or. App. 508, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-maass-orctapp-1992.