Brown v. Maass

840 P.2d 1393, 116 Or. App. 508, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2205
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedNovember 18, 1992
Docket90-C-11246; CA A71216
StatusPublished

This text of 840 P.2d 1393 (Brown v. Maass) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Maass, 840 P.2d 1393, 116 Or. App. 508, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2205 (Or. Ct. App. 1992).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Petitioner petitions for Supreme Court review. We treat the petition as one for reconsideration, ORAP 9.15, allow it and reverse the judgment.

Petitioner’s petition for post-conviction relief was dismissed by the trial court, because it was not timely filed under ORS 138.510(2)(b). We affirmed that judgment, because the petition for post-conviction relief was filed more than 120 days after the time limit in ORS 138.510(2)(b) became effective. We were held to be wrong in doing that. Boone v. Wright, 314 Or 135, 836 P2d 727 (1992).

Reconsideration allowed; decision withdrawn; reversed and remanded for further proceedings.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Boone v. Wright
836 P.2d 727 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1992)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
840 P.2d 1393, 116 Or. App. 508, 1992 Ore. App. LEXIS 2205, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-maass-orctapp-1992.