Brown v. Lieberman

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Brown v. Lieberman

36 A.2d 512, 349 Pa. 72, 1944 Pa. LEXIS 406

CourtSupreme Court of Pennsylvania

DecidedJanuary 5, 1944

DocketAppeal, 14

StatusPublished

This text of 36 A.2d 512 (Brown v. Lieberman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Lieberman, 36 A.2d 512, 349 Pa. 72, 1944 Pa. LEXIS 406 (Pa. 1944).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam,

Counsel for appellees stated at oral argument before this Court that a good and sufficient deed to the property described in the sheriff’s deed would be executed and delivered to the Township of Lower Nazareth, conveying the property to said Township, the judgment creditor. Therefore,, upon the execution and delivery of such deed by Asher T. Brown and Oliver S. Woodring, conveying said property free from all encumbrances, the appeal will be dismissed. Costs to be paid by the Township.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam,

Counsel for appellees stated at oral argument before this Court that a good and sufficient deed to the property described in the sheriff’s deed would be executed and delivered to the Township of Lower Nazareth, conveying the property to said Township, the judgment creditor. Therefore,, upon the execution and delivery of such deed by Asher T. Brown and Oliver S. Woodring, conveying said property free from all encumbrances, the appeal will be dismissed. Costs to be paid by the Township.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

36 A.2d 512, 349 Pa. 72, 1944 Pa. LEXIS 406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-lieberman-pa-1944.