Brown v. Lewis Manufacturing Co.
220 So. 2d 6, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2414
Opinion
By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date Sept. 18, 1968.
We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 32 F.S.A.
Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.
The petition is therefore denied.
The petitioner’s request for attorneys’ fees is also denied.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Lewis Manufacturing Co., 220 So. 2d 6, 1969 Fla. LEXIS 2414 (Fla. 1969).
220 So. 2d 6 (Brown v. Lewis Manufacturing Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
In Re Rules Governing Conduct of Attorneys in Fla.
220 So. 2d 6 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1969)