Brown v. Levy
38 A.3d 768, 614 Pa. 459, 2012 WL 502277, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 340
This text of 38 A.3d 768 (Brown v. Levy) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Pennsylvania primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brown v. Levy, 38 A.3d 768, 614 Pa. 459, 2012 WL 502277, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 340 (Pa. 2012).
Opinion
ORDER
AND NOW, this 16th day of February 2012, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is GRANTED, LIMITED TO the issue set [769]*769forth below. Allocatur is DENIED as to all remaining issues. The issue, as stated by petitioner, is:
Does an inmate’s mandamus action that seeks (i) an order compelling a protho-notary to accept a previously rejected civil complaint for filing, and (ii) an award of money damages for alleged physical and mental suffering supposedly caused by the prothonotary’s actions, address “the effects of actions by a government party on the life of an inmate confined in prison” so as to constitute “prison conditions litigation” as that term is defined in § 6601 of the Pennsylvania Prison Litigation Reform Act, 42 Pa.C.S. § 6601, et seq. (“PLRA”), thereby subjecting the action to dismissal pursuant to the “three strikes” rule of 42 Pa.C.S. § 6602(f)?
The issue will be SUBMITTED on briefs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Brown v. Levy
73 A.3d 514 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 2013)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
38 A.3d 768, 614 Pa. 459, 2012 WL 502277, 2012 Pa. LEXIS 340, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-levy-pa-2012.