Brown v. Lee

7 Ga. 267
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedAugust 15, 1849
DocketNo. 50
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 7 Ga. 267 (Brown v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Lee, 7 Ga. 267 (Ga. 1849).

Opinion

By the Court.

Nisbet, J.

delivering the opinion.

[1.] In a well considered case, determined at Americus, in 1847, this Court held, that “ if an insolvent debtor assigns his property, to one or more persons, in trust, for the benefit of a portion of his creditors, to the exclusion of the rest, such conveyance is null and void, by the Act of 1818.” Ezekiel vs. Dixon, 3 Kelly, 146.

That is this case — an assignment in trust, by a debtor, who is insolvent, to pay one class of creditors first, and then to pay all others. A preference is here given to some, over other creditors, by a trust assignment. This, the assignor cannot do. He may prefer creditors by a direct sale to them, in extinguishment of their claims, or he may bona fide sell his property to a stranger, and apply the proceeds to the debts of favored creditors; but he cannot discriminate, in a trust deed, between creditors. The ingenious counsel for the plaintiff in error, has failed to distinguish this case from that of Ezekiel and Dixon. This deed is void, un[269]*269der the Act of 1818. Whether it is or not, is'the only question made in this record, although another was argued.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Carey v. Giles
10 Ga. 9 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 1851)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
7 Ga. 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-lee-ga-1849.