Brown v. Lee
This text of 7 Ga. 267 (Brown v. Lee) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
By the Court. —
delivering the opinion.
That is this case — an assignment in trust, by a debtor, who is insolvent, to pay one class of creditors first, and then to pay all others. A preference is here given to some, over other creditors, by a trust assignment. This, the assignor cannot do. He may prefer creditors by a direct sale to them, in extinguishment of their claims, or he may bona fide sell his property to a stranger, and apply the proceeds to the debts of favored creditors; but he cannot discriminate, in a trust deed, between creditors. The ingenious counsel for the plaintiff in error, has failed to distinguish this case from that of Ezekiel and Dixon. This deed is void, un[269]*269der the Act of 1818. Whether it is or not, is'the only question made in this record, although another was argued.
Let the judgment be affirmed.
Note. — See post, No. 52, Lee et al. vs. Broten, et al. — [Rep:]
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
7 Ga. 267, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-lee-ga-1849.