Brown v. Labus

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Brown v. Labus

19 A.D.2d 554, 241 N.Y.S.2d 10, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3686

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 27, 1963

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 19 A.D.2d 554 (Brown v. Labus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Labus, 19 A.D.2d 554, 241 N.Y.S.2d 10, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3686 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1963).

Pincite

Opinion

In a proceeding under former article VIII (§ 119 et seq.) of the Domestic Relations Law, the defendant appeals from an order of filiation and an order of support against him, both dated April 26, 1962 and entered May 22, 1962, made by the former Children’s Court of Nassau County, after a nonjury trial. Orders reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and a new trial ordered. In our opinion the finding that the defendant is the father of the child born to the petitioner is not supported by “ entirely satisfactory ” evidence (cf. Commissioner of Public Welfare of City of N. Y. v. Ryan, 23-8 App. Div. 607; Drummond v. Dolan, 155 App. Div. 449;' Commissioner of [555]*555Public Welfare of City of N. T. v. Koiel, 256 App. Div, 352). ITglietta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In a proceeding under former article VIII (§ 119 et seq.) of the Domestic Relations Law, the defendant appeals from an order of filiation and an order of support against him, both dated April 26, 1962 and entered May 22, 1962, made by the former Children’s Court of Nassau County, after a nonjury trial. Orders reversed on the law and the facts, without costs, and a new trial ordered. In our opinion the finding that the defendant is the father of the child born to the petitioner is not supported by “ entirely satisfactory ” evidence (cf. Commissioner of Public Welfare of City of N. Y. v. Ryan, 23-8 App. Div. 607; Drummond v. Dolan, 155 App. Div. 449;' Commissioner of [555]*555Public Welfare of City of N. T. v. Koiel, 256 App. Div, 352). ITglietta, Acting P. J., Kleinfeld, Christ, Brennan and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

19 A.D.2d 554, 241 N.Y.S.2d 10, 1963 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3686, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-labus-nyappdiv-1963.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack