Brown v. Kiechler Mfg. Co.

98 Ohio St. (N.S.) 440
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedMarch 19, 1918
DocketNo. 15510
StatusPublished

This text of 98 Ohio St. (N.S.) 440 (Brown v. Kiechler Mfg. Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Kiechler Mfg. Co., 98 Ohio St. (N.S.) 440 (Ohio 1918).

Opinion

It is ordered and'adjudged by this court, that the judgment of the said court of appeals be, and the same hereby is, reversed; for the reason that the issue joined by the pleadings as to the mental capacity of the plaintiff to contract at the time he signed the paper writing purporting to be a release, as set forth in the answer, is a question of fact, to [441]*441be determined by a jury under proper instructions, and for this reason, the trial court erred in directing a verdict for the defendant. (Perry v. The M. O’Neil Company, 78 Ohio St., 200, approved and followed.)

It is further ordered and adjudged, that this cause be remanded to the superior court of Cincinnati, Ohio, for further proceedings and trial according to the law.

Judgment reversed.

Nichols, C. J., Wanamaker, Newman and Donahue, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
98 Ohio St. (N.S.) 440, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-kiechler-mfg-co-ohio-1918.