Brown v. Keuffer

Missouri Court of Appeals

Brown v. Keuffer

961 S.W.2d 915, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 231, 1998 WL 50040

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 10, 1998

DocketNo. 72541

StatusPublished

This text of 961 S.W.2d 915 (Brown v. Keuffer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Keuffer, 961 S.W.2d 915, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 231, 1998 WL 50040 (Mo. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal summary judgment for defendants. The lawsuit is a continuation of the dispute decided by this court in Kueffer v. Brown, 879 S.W.2d 658 (Mo.App. E.D.1994). The motion, the response and supporting affidavits support the finding and conclusion there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Plaintiffs appeal summary judgment for defendants. The lawsuit is a continuation of the dispute decided by this court in Kueffer v. Brown, 879 S.W.2d 658 (Mo.App. E.D.1994). The motion, the response and supporting affidavits support the finding and conclusion there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and defendants are entitled to judgment as a matter of law. An opinion would have no precedential value. The judgment is affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

961 S.W.2d 915, 1998 Mo. App. LEXIS 231, 1998 WL 50040, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-keuffer-moctapp-1998.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack