Brown v. Kearns

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Brown v. Kearns

121 N.W. 1133, 108 Minn. 526, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 756

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJune 18, 1909

DocketNos. 16,129—(124)

StatusPublished

This text of 121 N.W. 1133 (Brown v. Kearns) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Kearns, 121 N.W. 1133, 108 Minn. 526, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 756 (Mich. 1909).

Pincite

Opinion

Pee Cueiam.

Plaintiff and respondent sought to recover from defendant and appellant $70, with interest, for rent. A jury in the municipal court, and upon appeal in the district court, returned a verdict for defendant and against plaintiff. The district court granted a new trial. The only question presented on appeal is whether it thereby abused its discretion. An examination of the record has satisfied us that no such abuse appears. It would serve no useful purpose to discuss at length the details of the facts, which involve no controversy of principle and which are of no general interest.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Pee Cueiam.

Plaintiff and respondent sought to recover from defendant and appellant $70, with interest, for rent. A jury in the municipal court, and upon appeal in the district court, returned a verdict for defendant and against plaintiff. The district court granted a new trial. The only question presented on appeal is whether it thereby abused its discretion. An examination of the record has satisfied us that no such abuse appears. It would serve no useful purpose to discuss at length the details of the facts, which involve no controversy of principle and which are of no general interest.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

121 N.W. 1133, 108 Minn. 526, 1909 Minn. LEXIS 756, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-kearns-minn-1909.