Brown v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.
293 So. 2d 171
Opinion
Len R. BROWN, Sr.
v.
KAISER ALUMINUM AND CHEMICAL CORP.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Not considered. Not timely filed. No postmark on envelope.
TATE, J., is of the opinion the writ should be considered. The intent of the rule is that timely mailing is considered timely filing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp., 293 So. 2d 171 (La. 1974).
293 So. 2d 171 (Brown v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Richard v. Teague
636 So. 2d 1160 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1994)
Benoit v. Grey Wolf Drilling, Inc.
520 So. 2d 1104 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
Recatto v. Bayou Steel Corp.
508 So. 2d 877 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
Chauvin v. Gulf Coast Minerals, Inc.
509 So. 2d 622 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
Jackson v. Louisiana Power & Light
510 So. 2d 8 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
Berry v. Holston Well Service, Inc.
488 So. 2d 934 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1986)