Brown v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.
293 So. 2d 171
This text of 293 So. 2d 171 (Brown v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brown v. Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corp., 293 So. 2d 171 (La. 1974).
Opinion
Len R. BROWN, Sr.
v.
KAISER ALUMINUM AND CHEMICAL CORP.
Supreme Court of Louisiana.
Not considered. Not timely filed. No postmark on envelope.
TATE, J., is of the opinion the writ should be considered. The intent of the rule is that timely mailing is considered timely filing.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Richard v. Teague
636 So. 2d 1160 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1994)
Benoit v. Grey Wolf Drilling, Inc.
520 So. 2d 1104 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
Recatto v. Bayou Steel Corp.
508 So. 2d 877 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
Chauvin v. Gulf Coast Minerals, Inc.
509 So. 2d 622 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
Jackson v. Louisiana Power & Light
510 So. 2d 8 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1987)
Berry v. Holston Well Service, Inc.
488 So. 2d 934 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1986)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
293 So. 2d 171, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-kaiser-aluminum-and-chemical-corp-la-1974.