Brown v. Johnson

District Court, D. Nevada·Decided April 7, 2022·No. 2:21-cv-01396·Unknown

Opinion

ASA JAVON BROWN, Case No. 2:21-cv-01396-GMN-VCF

Petitioner, v. ORDER WILLIAM HUTCHINGS, et al., Respondents. Good cause appearing, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Petitioner Asa Javon Brown’s unopposed first Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 13) is GRANTED. Brown has until July 5, 2022, to file an amended petition for writ of habeas corpus.1 Also before the Court is Brown’s Motion for Status Check (ECF No. 8). Brown filed his motion for status check before his appointed counsel entered a notice of appearance (ECF No. 10). Counsel represented that he has met with Brown at High Desert State Prison (ECF No. 13). Accordingly, his motion for status check is denied as moot. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED: 1. Petitioner Asa Javon Brown’s unopposed first Motion for Extension of Time (ECF No. 13) is granted. 2. Petitioner Asa Javon Brown’s Motion for Status Check (ECF No. 8) is denied as moot. DATED: April 7, 2022

________________________________ GLORIA M. NAVARRO UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 1 Petitioner at all times remains responsible for calculating the running of the federal limitation period and timely presenting claims. That is, by setting a deadline to amend the petition and/or by granting any extension thereof, the Court makes no finding or representation that the petition, any amendments thereto, and/or any claims contained therein are not subject to dismissal as untimely. See Sossa v. Diaz, 729 F.3d 1225, 1235 (9th Cir. 2013).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Johnson, (D. Nev. 2022).

Brown v. Johnson (Brown v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Armando Sossa v. Ralph M. Diaz
729 F.3d 1225 (Ninth Circuit, 2013)