Brown v. Johnson

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. Johnson. Read the opinion of the Court — 224 F.3d 461
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided June 16, 1999·No. 98-50591·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 98-50591 Conference Calendar

LEO BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

GARY L. JOHNSON, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Institutional Division; BRYAN HARTNETT, Warden; TROY SCAROBOROUGH; TOMMY SWATE, DR., Defendants-Appellees.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Texas USDC No. SA-98-CV-33 - - - - - - - - - -

June 16, 1999

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and PARKER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Leo Brown (TDCJ # 515184) has filed a motion for permission

to proceed in forma pauperis (IFP) in the appeal of the district

court’s order denying his motion to reconsider its dismissal of

his complaint for failure to pay the initial partial filing fee

as required by the Prison Litigation Reform Act. Brown cannot

show that the district court’s refusal to vacate its Fed. R. Civ.

P. 41(b) dismissal of his complaint was so unwarranted as to

constitute an abuse of discretion. See Seven Elves, Inc. v.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 98-50591 - 2 -

Eskenazi, 635 F.2d 396, 402 (5th Cir. 1981). Because Brown’s

appeal does not present a nonfrivolous issue, his motion to

proceed IFP is DENIED and his appeal is DISMISSED. See Baugh v.

Taylor, 117 F.3d 197, 202 & n.24 (5th Cir. 1997).

MOTION DENIED; APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Johnson, (5th Cir. 1999).

Brown v. Johnson (Brown v. Johnson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related