Brown v. Jenison

3 Sandf. 732
CourtThe Superior Court of New York City
DecidedApril 12, 1851
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 3 Sandf. 732 (Brown v. Jenison) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering The Superior Court of New York City primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Jenison, 3 Sandf. 732 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1851).

Opinion

By the Court. Duer, J.

The plaintiff referred to section 152 of the code, but it does not apply to his motion. A sham answer and defence, is one that is false in fact, and not pleaded in good faith. It may be perfectly good in form, and to all appearance a perfect defence. Section 152 provides for striking out such answers. A frivolous answer, is one that shows no defence, conceding all that it alleges to be true. Each may be stricken out on motion, but it is under different provisions of the code. The question here is, whether the answer is frivolous. (The judge then examined the answer in this respect.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Livingston v. Hammer
7 Bosw. 670 (The Superior Court of New York City, 1860)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
3 Sandf. 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-jenison-nysuperctnyc-1851.