Brown v. Huntington Medical Group

238 A.D.2d 367, 657 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3817
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 14, 1997·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

—In an action to recover damages, inter alia, for wrongful death, the defendants Huntington Medical Group, Robert Allen Feld, and Timothy E. Sass appeal from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Lama, J.), dated January 4, 1996, as denied their motions to dismiss the complaint as barred by the Statute of Limitations.

Ordered that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.

The Supreme Court properly concluded that this action was timely commenced since it was brought within six months of the dismissal of an earlier action which had been improperly commenced because the plaintiff had not yet been granted letters testamentary (see, CPLR 205 [a]; Carrick v Central Gen. Hosp., 51 NY2d 242; Vigliotti v Ricci, 229 AD2d 389; Brown v Zaino, 226 AD2d 492). Mangano, P. J., Ritter, Sullivan, Altman and McGinity, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Huntington Medical Group, 238 A.D.2d 367, 657 N.Y.S.2d 333, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3817 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

238 A.D.2d 367 (Brown v. Huntington Medical Group) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Reliance Insurance v. Polyvision Corp.
390 F. Supp. 2d 269 (E.D. New York, 2005)
Chase Manhattan Bank, N. A. v. Wolowitz
272 A.D.2d 428 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)