Brown v. Hooks

147 S.E. 926, 150 S.C. 241, 1929 S.C. LEXIS 133
CourtSupreme Court of South Carolina
DecidedApril 4, 1929
Docket12631
StatusPublished

This text of 147 S.E. 926 (Brown v. Hooks) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Hooks, 147 S.E. 926, 150 S.C. 241, 1929 S.C. LEXIS 133 (S.C. 1929).

Opinions

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Chief Justice Watts.

This action was commenced on the 21st day of November. 1927. Upon the call of the calendar at the March term, 1928, Court of Common Pleas for Oconee County, S. C., a motion was made by defendant-appellant to refer the issues to the master. The motion was refused, and the defendant brings this appeal from the order denying the motion to refer. Notice of intention to- appeal was given in due time.

The question involved is: Did the Circuit Judge err in refusing to refer the issues to the master? The exceptions are overruled under the recent case decided by this Court of Sloan v. Burnett (S. C.), 146 S. E., 601, and authorities therein cited.

Judgment affirmed.

Messrs. Justices Brease, Stabrer, and Carter concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Sloan v. Burnett
146 S.E. 601 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1929)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
147 S.E. 926, 150 S.C. 241, 1929 S.C. LEXIS 133, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-hooks-sc-1929.