Brown v. Holt

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Brown v. Holt

1935 OK 382, 50 P.2d 146, 174 Okla. 319, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1460

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedApril 9, 1935

DocketNo. 25570.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 1935 OK 382 (Brown v. Holt) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Holt, 1935 OK 382, 50 P.2d 146, 174 Okla. 319, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1460 (Okla. 1935).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The journal entry and the record show -that this cause was disposed of on the 25th day of February, 1933, upon an agreed statement of facts. The defendant in error has filed motion to dismiss for the reason the appeal from the judgment of the court was not filed in this court within six months from the date of the judgment rendered. The movant cites in support thereof Durant et al. v. Nesbit, 59 Okla. 11, 157 P. 353, and related cases. This motion is not contested. A response was ordered on November 13, 1933, but none has been filed.

This court has repeatedly held that an *320 appeal must be taken within six months from the date of the rendition of judgment. It appearing, therefore, that the record reasonably supports the motion to dismiss on the grounds that this proceeding was not filed until more than six months from the date of the judgment rendered, the appeal should be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The journal entry and the record show -that this cause was disposed of on the 25th day of February, 1933, upon an agreed statement of facts. The defendant in error has filed motion to dismiss for the reason the appeal from the judgment of the court was not filed in this court within six months from the date of the judgment rendered. The movant cites in support thereof Durant et al. v. Nesbit, 59 Okla. 11, 157 P. 353, and related cases. This motion is not contested. A response was ordered on November 13, 1933, but none has been filed.

This court has repeatedly held that an *320 appeal must be taken within six months from the date of the rendition of judgment. It appearing, therefore, that the record reasonably supports the motion to dismiss on the grounds that this proceeding was not filed until more than six months from the date of the judgment rendered, the appeal should be dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1935 OK 382, 50 P.2d 146, 174 Okla. 319, 1935 Okla. LEXIS 1460, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-holt-okla-1935.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack