Brown v. Hoffman Co.

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Hoffman Co.

555 F. App'x 247

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 20, 2014·No. No. 13-2398·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome J. Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no re[248] versible error, Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Hoffman Co., No. 1:13—cv01364-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 7, 2018; entered Nov. 15, 2013). We grant Brown leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jerome J. Brown appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no re[248] versible error, Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Brown v. Hoffman Co., No. 1:13—cv01364-LMB-TRJ (E.D. Va. filed Nov. 7, 2018; entered Nov. 15, 2013). We grant Brown leave to proceed in forma pauperis. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brown v. Hoffman Co., 555 F. App'x 247 (4th Cir. 2014).

Pincite

555 F. App'x 247 (Brown v. Hoffman Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.