Brown v. Hobbs
This text of Brown v. Hobbs (Brown v. Hobbs) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 01-7154
JAMES EDWARD BROWN,
Petitioner - Appellant,
versus
D. L. HOBBS, Warden, Jesup FCI,
Respondent - Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Spartanburg. G. Ross Anderson, Jr., District Judge. (CA-01-2173-7-13BG)
Submitted: September 20, 2001 Decided: October 9, 2001
Before WIDENER, LUTTIG, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
James Edward Brown, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:
James Edward Brown appeals the district court order adopting
the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241 (1994) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the
record, the district court order and the magistrate judge’s report
and recommendation and affirm. We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in
the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brown v. Hobbs, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-hobbs-ca4-2001.