Brown v. Hobbs

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Hobbs

20 F. App'x 175

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 9, 2001·No. No. 01-7154·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Brown appeals the district court order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record, the district court order and the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

James Edward Brown appeals the district court order adopting the magistrate judge’s recommendation and dismissing his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (1994) petition without prejudice. We have reviewed the record, the district court order and the magistrate judge’s report and recommendation and affirm. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Brown v. Hobbs, 20 F. App'x 175 (4th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

20 F. App'x 175 (Brown v. Hobbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related