Brown v. Herzberg

130 A.D. 894, 114 N.Y.S. 901
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided February 15, 1909·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The defendant made out a case which required the granting of the motion to dismiss the complaint unless a reasonable excuse was presented by' the plaintiff for the delay. . We can find no such excuse in the papers submitted. ■The evidence shows that in consequence of the delay the defendant will be unable to produce upon' the trial her most important and material witnesses. The order should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion granted, with ten dollars costs. Present — Ingraham, McLaughlin, Clarke, Houghton and Scott, JJ. Order reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion granted, with ten dollars costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Herzberg, 130 A.D. 894, 114 N.Y.S. 901 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1909).

130 A.D. 894 (Brown v. Herzberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Curro v. Barrett
101 Misc. 411 (Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York, 1917)