Brown v. Henderson
This text of Brown v. Henderson (Brown v. Henderson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court, District of Columbia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA
RANDY G. BROWN,
Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 13-77 (JEB) KAYA HENDERSON, et al.,
Defendants.
MEMORANDUM OPINION
Plaintiff Randy Brown filed a one-paragraph pro se Complaint on January 18, 2013. He
opaquely alleged discrimination in violation of the Americans with Disabilities Act, but offered
no facts whatsoever in support. See ECF No. 1 (Complaint). The District of Columbia moved to
dismiss the case on April 24. See ECF No. 12. The next day, the Court issued an Order
directing Plaintiff to respond to the Motion by May 28 or risk the Court’s deeming the matter
conceded. See ECF No. 13. The Court subsequently granted Plaintiff an extension until July 1,
although he sought it after the deadline had expired. See Minute Order, May 30, 2013. As
Plaintiff has still never responded, the Court will treat the Motion as conceded and dismiss the
case without prejudice. See LCvR 7(b). A contemporaneous Order will so state.
/s/ James E. Boasberg JAMES E. BOASBERG United States District Judge
Date: July 8, 2013
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Brown v. Henderson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-henderson-dcd-2013.