Brown v. Hawkins
79 S.E. 76, 13 Ga. App. 309, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 136
Opinion
The Court of Appeals is without jurisdiction to consider assignments of error addressed solely to the finding of a jury upon issuable facts. There is no complaint that any error of law was committed; the evidence authorized the verdict rendered; and though the testimony in behalf of the losing party would have warranted a different verdict, the trial judge did not err in refusing a new trial, for the credibility of the witnesses is a matter exclusively for the jury. Davis v. Kirkland, 1 Ga. App. 5 (58 S. E. 209). Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Hawkins, 79 S.E. 76, 13 Ga. App. 309, 1913 Ga. App. LEXIS 136 (Ga. Ct. App. 1913).
79 S.E. 76 (Brown v. Hawkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Wilson v. State
84 S.E. 81 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 1915)