Brown v. Hathaway

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: April 6, 2011
• Docket: 10-7720
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-7720

SAMUEL L. BROWN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

ANTHONY HATHAWAY; LILLIAN GILLIAM; LT. BIGGS; MS. WALTON,

Defendants– Appellees,

and

A. SPRUILL; GIBBS; SANDERLIN; C/O BROWN,

Defendants.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:09-ct-03004-BO)

Submitted: March 31, 2011 Decided: April 6, 2011

Before NIEMEYER, SHEDD, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Samuel L. Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Yvonne Bulluck Ricci, Assistant Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Samuel L. Brown appeals the district court’s orders

denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint. We

have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Brown V. Hathaway, No. 5:09-ct-03004-BO (E.D.N.C.

Sept. 29, 2009; Nov. 18, 2010). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED