Brown v. Griffin

District Court, S.D. New York·Decided November 19, 2019·No. 7:18-cv-05439·Unknown

Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK CARLTON BROWN, Plaintiff, No. 18-CV-5439 (KMK) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE THOMAS GRIFFIN, ef al., Defendants. KENNETH M. KARAS, United States District Judge: On September 25, 2019, the Court issued an Opinion & Order (the “Opinion’’) granting Defendants’ Motion To Dismiss. (See generally Op. (Dkt. No. 33).) The Opinion granted Plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint. (/d. at 19.) Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint or otherwise communicated with the Court Accordingly, it is hereby ORDERED that Plaintiff shall show cause, by no later than 30 days of the date of this Order, as to why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. See Armstrong v. Guccione, 470 F.3d 89, 103 n.1 (2d Cir. 2006) (noting that “a federal district court has the inherent power to dismiss a case sua sponte for failure to prosecute” (citing Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626 630-32(1962)). The Court may dismiss this case without prejudice without further notice in the event that good cause is not shown. SO ORDERED. Dated: November 18, 2019 White Plains, New York Wk United States District Judge

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Griffin, (S.D.N.Y. 2019).

Brown v. Griffin (Brown v. Griffin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Link v. Wabash Railroad
370 U.S. 626 (Supreme Court, 1962)
Armstrong v. Guccione
470 F.3d 89 (Second Circuit, 2006)