Brown v. Grand Trunk Western R.

124 F.2d 1016, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2601
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
DecidedDecember 9, 1941
DocketNos. 9117-9119
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 124 F.2d 1016 (Brown v. Grand Trunk Western R.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Grand Trunk Western R., 124 F.2d 1016, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2601 (6th Cir. 1941).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It appears from the motion of appellee, The Grand Trunk Western Railroad Company, to dismiss the appeals herein and the response thereto by Howard H. Campbell, that John S. McDonald was retained as special counsel by Thomas S. Read, Attorney General of Michigan, to defend the Auditor General in the above-styled causes in the District Court and that said McDonald retained Howard H. Campbell to assist him in said actions.

It further appears from said motion and response that the appeals herein were filed solely by Howard H. Campbell as special counsel under the above employment. It further appears that said appeals were filed without the knowledge or consent, and over the protest of, the Attorney General of Michigan and of Vernon J. Brown, Auditor General of the State of Michigan.

The general rule is that an attorney cannot, on his own motion, appeal from a judgment or decree injuriously affecting the interest of his client without said client’s consent.

It is evident from the record herein that the said special attorney has no personal interest in this litigation. He had certain duties to perform as special counsel through his employment by John S. McDonald and their performance or nonperformance was of no personal benefit to him. The authority of attorneys, no more appearing, to represent parties in an original suit is at an end when the first judgment is rendered.

It is clear from the foregoing rules that Howard H. Campbell has no power, by virtue of his employment alone, to prosecute these appeals on behalf of appellant, Vernon J. Brown, Auditor Gen[1017]*1017eral of the State of Michigan. It follows that the appeals, being unauthorized, should be dismissed.

Appeals dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Telecom Italia S.P.A v. L-3 Communications
335 F. App'x 770 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)
Telecom Italia S.P.A. v. L-3 Communications Corp.
335 F. App'x 770 (Tenth Circuit, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
124 F.2d 1016, 1941 U.S. App. LEXIS 2601, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-grand-trunk-western-r-ca6-1941.