Brown v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United Workmen

California Court of Appeal

Brown v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United Workmen

110 P. 351, 13 Cal. App. 537

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedJune 1, 1910

DocketCiv. No. 796.

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 110 P. 351 (Brown v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United Workmen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Grand Lodge of Ancient Order of United Workmen, 110 P. 351, 13 Cal. App. 537 (Cal. Ct. App. 1910).

Pincite

Opinion

KERRIGAN, J.

This is an action based upan a benefit certificate issued by the defendant to the husband of the plaintiff, by the terms of which, upon the husband’s death, the defendant agreed to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $2,000.

The plaintiff’s husband, Willis F. Brown, disappeared in October, 1900, and had not been heard from for more than seven years when this action was brought. In the trial court judgment went for the plaintiff, and this appeal, according to the notice thereof, is from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The appeal from the judgment is based on the sole ground that the evidence does not support the findings. The only record on appeal, however, is the judgment-roll, i. el, the complaint, answer, findings and judgment. No evidence has been brought up, and the transcript also fails to show that any motion for a new trial was ever made. In this condition of the record we are bound to assume that the evidence was sufficient to support the findings. And upon examination of the findings it is apparent that they support the "judgment.

Giving full force to the authorities cited to sustain appellant’s position, that in addition to the absence of an individual for seven years, it must also appear that a diligent effort has been made to locate the absentee, still we cannot perceive how this aids appellant, for the court found that plaintiff had made inquiries in all places where her husband might reasonably be expected to be found if alive, and that she had also exhausted every source of information in her efforts to locate him, but all without avail.

The judgment and order are affirmed.

Hall, J., and Cooper, P. J., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

KERRIGAN, J.

This is an action based upan a benefit certificate issued by the defendant to the husband of the plaintiff, by the terms of which, upon the husband’s death, the defendant agreed to pay to the plaintiff the sum of $2,000.

The plaintiff’s husband, Willis F. Brown, disappeared in October, 1900, and had not been heard from for more than seven years when this action was brought. In the trial court judgment went for the plaintiff, and this appeal, according to the notice thereof, is from the judgment and from an order denying a motion for a new trial.

The appeal from the judgment is based on the sole ground that the evidence does not support the findings. The only record on appeal, however, is the judgment-roll, i. el, the complaint, answer, findings and judgment. No evidence has been brought up, and the transcript also fails to show that any motion for a new trial was ever made. In this condition of the record we are bound to assume that the evidence was sufficient to support the findings. And upon examination of the findings it is apparent that they support the "judgment.

Giving full force to the authorities cited to sustain appellant’s position, that in addition to the absence of an individual for seven years, it must also appear that a diligent effort has been made to locate the absentee, still we cannot perceive how this aids appellant, for the court found that plaintiff had made inquiries in all places where her husband might reasonably be expected to be found if alive, and that she had also exhausted every source of information in her efforts to locate him, but all without avail.

The judgment and order are affirmed.

Hall, J., and Cooper, P. J., concurred.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

110 P. 351, 13 Cal. App. 537, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-grand-lodge-of-ancient-order-of-united-workmen-calctapp-1910.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack