Brown v. Google LLC

District Court, N.D. California·Decided August 11, 2021·No. 4:20-cv-03664·Unknown

Opinion

CHASOM BROWN, et al., Case No. 20-cv-03664-LHK (SVK)

Plaintiffs, ORDER ON ADMINISTRATIVE v. MOTIONS TO FILE UNDER SEAL

GOOGLE LLC, Re: Dkt. Nos. 198, 204, 210, 217, 228, 229 Defendant.

Before the Court are several administrative motions to file under seal materials submitted in connection with discovery disputes in this case. Dkt. Nos. 198, 204, 210, 217, 228, 229; see also Dkt. 203. Courts recognize a “general right to inspect and copy public records and documents, including judicial records and documents.” Kamakana v. City & Cnty. Of Honolulu, 447 F.3d 1172, 1178 (9th Cir. 2006) (quoting Nixon v. Warner Communs., Inc., 435 U.S. 589, 597 & n.7 (1978)). A request to seal court records therefore starts with a “strong presumption in favor of access.” Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1178 (quoting Foltz v. State Farm Mut. Auto. Ins. Co., 331 F.3d 1122, 1135 (9th Cir. 2003)). The standard for overcoming the presumption of public access to court records depends on the purpose for which the records are filed with the court. A party seeking to seal court records relating to motions that are “more than tangentially related to the underlying cause of action” must demonstrate “compelling reasons” that support secrecy. Ctr. For Auto Safety v. Chrysler Grp., 809 F.3d 1092, 1099 (9th Cir. 2016). For records attached to motions that re “not related, or only tangentially related, to the merits of the case,” the lower “good cause” standard of Rule 26(c) applies. Id.; see also Kamakana, 447 F.3d at 1179. A party moving to seal court records must also comply with the procedures established by Civil Local Here, the “good cause” standard applies because the information the parties seek to seal was submitted to the Court in connection with discovery-related motions, rather than a motion that concerns the merits of the case. The Court may reach different conclusions regarding sealing these documents under different standards or in a different context. Having considered the motions to seal, supporting declarations, and the pleadings on file, and good cause appearing, the Court ORDERS as follows: 1. ECF 198 Court’s Ruling Document Sought to be on Motion to Reason(s) for Court’s Ruling Sealed Seal GRANTED as to Narrowly tailored to protect Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel redacted portions at: confidential technical information regarding Dispute P3 regarding features of Google’s Page 1, lines 16 operations and consumer data, Page 2, lines 17 including the various types of Page 3, lines 4, 7, 9- Google’s internal identifiers/cookies 10, 19-24, 28 and their proprietary functions, the Page 4, lines 1-3 various types of logs maintained by Page 6, lines 6-11, 28 Google, and information contained Page 7, lines 1-2 in those logs, that Google maintains Page 8, lines 1, 28 as confidential in the ordinary course Page 9, lines 1 of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google’s competitors.

GRANTED as to Narrowly tailored to protect Declaration of John A. Yanchunis In redacted portions at: confidential technical information Support Of Plaintiffs’ Motion To Page 1, lines 8-10, regarding features of Google’s Compel regarding Dispute P3 13-14 operations and consumer data, Page 2, lines 12-13 including the various types of Google’s internal identifiers/cookies and their proprietary functions, that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google’s competitors.

GRANTED as to the Contains confidential technical Exhibit 1 to the Declaration of John document in its information regarding features of A. Yanchunis entirety Google’s operations and consumer data storage infrastructure, that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google’s competitors. GRANTED as to the Contains confidential technical Exhibit 2 to the Declaration of John document in its information regarding features of A. Yanchunis entirety Google’s operations and consumer data, including the Google’s internal identifiers/cookies, that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google’s competitors.

GRANTED as to Narrowly tailored to protect Exhibit 3 to the Declaration of John redacted portions at: confidential technical information A. Yanchunis regarding features of Google’s Pages 2-3 operations and consumer data, including the various types of Google’s internal identifiers/cookies and their proprietary functions, that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google’s competitors.

GRANTED as to Narrowly tailored to protect Exhibit 4 to the Declaration of John redacted portions at: confidential technical information A. Yanchunis regarding features of Google’s Page 6, line 1, 17, 22 operations and consumer data, including the various types of Google’s internal identifiers/cookies and their proprietary functions, that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google’s competitors.

GRANTED as to the Contains confidential technical Exhibit 5 to the Declaration of John document in its information regarding features of A. Yanchunis entirety Google’s operations and consumer data, including the various types of Google’s internal identifiers/cookies and their proprietary functions, the various types of logs maintained by Google, and information contained as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google’s competitors. GRANTED as to the Contains confidential technical Exhibit 6 to the Declaration of John document in its information regarding features of A. Yanchunis: entirety Google’s operations and consumer data, including the various types of Google’s internal identifiers/cookies and their proprietary functions, that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google’s competitors.

GRANTED as to Narrowly tailored to protect Exhibit 7 to the Declaration of John redacted portions at: confidential technical information A. Yanchunis regarding features of Google’s Pages 1, 2, 3 operations and consumer data, including the various types of Google’s internal identifiers/cookies and their proprietary functions, that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google’s competitors.

GRANTED as to the Contains confidential technical Exhibit 8 to the Declaration of John document in its information regarding features of A. Yanchunis entirety Google’s operations and consumer data, including the various types of logs maintained by Google and retention periods applicable thereto, that Google maintains as confidential in the ordinary course of its business and is not generally known to the public or Google’s competitors. GRANTED as to Narrowly tailored to protect Proposed Order redacted portions at: confidential technical information Page 1, lines 18-19 regarding features of Google’s operations and consumer data, including the various types of Google’s internal identifiers/cookies. 2. ECF 204

Court’s Document Sought to be Reason(s) for Court’s Ruling Sealed Ruling on Motion to Seal Joint Submission Re: Nominations GRANTED for a Special Master and Proposed Protect individual privacy Orders interests. Exhibit A-1 to A-5 GRANTED Protect individual privacy interests. 3. ECF 210

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Google LLC, (N.D. Cal. 2021).

Brown v. Google LLC (Brown v. Google LLC) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related