Brown v. Gold Bond Building Products, Inc.

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Brown v. Gold Bond Building Products, Inc.

692 So. 2d 428, 1997 La. LEXIS 1067, 1997 WL 201823

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedApril 18, 1997

DocketNo. 96-C-3086

StatusPublished

This text of 692 So. 2d 428 (Brown v. Gold Bond Building Products, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Gold Bond Building Products, Inc., 692 So. 2d 428, 1997 La. LEXIS 1067, 1997 WL 201823 (La. 1997).

Pincite

Opinion

In re Brown, Harold; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Office of Workers’ Compensation, Dist. 7, No. 94-02485; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 96-CA-0091.

Writ granted. After reviewing the record in the instant case, this court finds, as did Judge Bowes in dissent, that the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support a dismissal with prejudice of relator’s claim against the defendant-employer. Accordingly, the judgments of the hearing officer and the court of appeal are vacated and set aside. Relator’s claim against the defendant-employer is reinstated, and the case is remanded to the Office of Workers’ Compensation for further proceedings.

VICTORY and TRAYLOR, JJ., would deny the writ. KNOLL, J., not on panel.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

In re Brown, Harold; — Plaintiffs); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Office of Workers’ Compensation, Dist. 7, No. 94-02485; to the Court of Appeal, Fifth Circuit, No. 96-CA-0091.

Writ granted. After reviewing the record in the instant case, this court finds, as did Judge Bowes in dissent, that the record does not contain sufficient evidence to support a dismissal with prejudice of relator’s claim against the defendant-employer. Accordingly, the judgments of the hearing officer and the court of appeal are vacated and set aside. Relator’s claim against the defendant-employer is reinstated, and the case is remanded to the Office of Workers’ Compensation for further proceedings.

VICTORY and TRAYLOR, JJ., would deny the writ. KNOLL, J., not on panel.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

692 So. 2d 428, 1997 La. LEXIS 1067, 1997 WL 201823, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-gold-bond-building-products-inc-la-1997.