Brown v. General Truck Sales, Inc.

District of Columbia Court of Appeals

Brown v. General Truck Sales, Inc.

155 A.2d 718, 1959 D.C. App. LEXIS 321

District of Columbia Court of Appeals·Decided November 19, 1959·No. No. 2431·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Appellee sued in .replevin to recover possession of two trucks. It based its claim on the fact that appellant had purchased a 1956 truck under a conditional sales contract and as collateral security for this purchase gave appellee a chattel mortgage on his 1953 truck and that appellant had defaulted in his payment on the purchase price of the 1956 truck. Appellant defended on the ground' that he had never signed [719] either the conditional sales contract or the chattel mortgage. After a hearing the court made a finding for appellee. We have examined the record and find no error.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Appellee sued in .replevin to recover possession of two trucks. It based its claim on the fact that appellant had purchased a 1956 truck under a conditional sales contract and as collateral security for this purchase gave appellee a chattel mortgage on his 1953 truck and that appellant had defaulted in his payment on the purchase price of the 1956 truck. Appellant defended on the ground' that he had never signed [719] either the conditional sales contract or the chattel mortgage. After a hearing the court made a finding for appellee. We have examined the record and find no error.

Affirmed.

Brown v. General Truck Sales, Inc., 155 A.2d 718, 1959 D.C. App. LEXIS 321 (D.C. 1959).

Pincite

155 A.2d 718 (Brown v. General Truck Sales, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.