Brown v. General Aniline and Film Corp.

325 A.2d 689, 65 N.J. 555, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 200
Supreme Court of New Jersey·Decided October 8, 1974·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed substantially for the reasons expressed by the Appellate Division.

For affirmance — Chief Justice Hughes, Justices Hall, Sullivan, P ashman and Clifford, and Judge Kolovsky— 6.

For reversal — Hone.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. General Aniline and Film Corp., 325 A.2d 689, 65 N.J. 555, 1974 N.J. LEXIS 200 (N.J. 1974).

325 A.2d 689 (Brown v. General Aniline and Film Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kibble v. Weeks Dredging & Construction Co.
735 A.2d 1142 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1999)
Buchanan v. Kerr-McGee Corp.
908 P.2d 242 (New Mexico Court of Appeals, 1995)
Alfone v. Sarno
432 A.2d 857 (Supreme Court of New Jersey, 1981)
Adams v. Woodbridge Sanitary Pottery Corp.
416 A.2d 422 (New Jersey Superior Court App Division, 1980)