Brown v. Garcia
81 F. App'x 86
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. Garcia. Read the opinion of the Court — 86 F. App'x 256 →
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 14, 2003·No. No. 03-15988; D.C. No. CV-98-20133-RMW·Published
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
A review of the record and appellant’s opening brief indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857 (9th Cir.1982) (per curiam).
Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court’s judgment.
AFFIRMED.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Garcia, 81 F. App'x 86 (9th Cir. 2003).
81 F. App'x 86 (Brown v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. James Lynn Hooton
693 F.2d 857 (Ninth Circuit, 1982)