Brown v. Gaffney
This text of 32 Ill. 251 (Brown v. Gaffney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Illinois Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Catón delivered the opinion of the Court:
In our former opinion in this case our views are expressed and have undergone no change. We now see, however, that in the amount allowed Brown, is not included the moneys which he advanced to Gaffney with which to go to California. This, in equity, we think, should be allowed, as if expressly stated in the written obligation, and such was no doubt the intention of the parties. It is probable that this was inadvertently overlooked in the court below, as it was in this court on the first hearing.
The decree is reversed and the suit remanded, with instructions to make the allowance as above suggested.
Decree reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
32 Ill. 251, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-gaffney-ill-1863.