Brown v. Friends

Fourth Circuit

Brown v. Friends

25 F.3d 1038, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20781, 1994 WL 197010

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMay 18, 1994

Docket92-6874

StatusPublished

This text of 25 F.3d 1038 (Brown v. Friends) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Brown v. Friends, 25 F.3d 1038, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20781, 1994 WL 197010 (4th Cir. 1994).

Pincite

Opinion

25 F.3d 1038
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Willie X BROWN; James X Ervin; Winfred X Fletcher; Calvin
E. X Gay; James 3X Prince; Jerome X Richardson;
Johnathan Lee X, Plaintiffs Appellants,
and
David X Batts; Andrew Belfield; George X Chapman; David X
Chestnut; Michael X Dorsey; Bruce X Driver; Joe X.
Harrison; Gregory Lamar X Smith; James 4X Brown; Plummer
X Davis; John A. X Mickens, Plaintiffs,
v.
Dorothy FRIENDS, Chief Dietician; David Garraghty, Warden;
Leon Williams, Food Service Manager; James
Wheeler; David Williams, Defendants Appellees.

No. 92-6874.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 4, 1994.
Decided: May 18, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-92-54-R, CA-92-167-R)

Willie X Brown, James X Ervin, Winfred X. Fletcher, Calvin E. X Gay, James 3X Prince, Jerome X Richardson, Johnathan Lee X, Appellants Pro Se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Reneen Evat Hewlett, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaints. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Batts, Nos. CA-92-54-R, CA-92-167-R (E.D. Va. July 8, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

25 F.3d 1038
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth Circuit.

Willie X BROWN; James X Ervin; Winfred X Fletcher; Calvin
E. X Gay; James 3X Prince; Jerome X Richardson;
Johnathan Lee X, Plaintiffs Appellants,
and
David X Batts; Andrew Belfield; George X Chapman; David X
Chestnut; Michael X Dorsey; Bruce X Driver; Joe X.
Harrison; Gregory Lamar X Smith; James 4X Brown; Plummer
X Davis; John A. X Mickens, Plaintiffs,
v.
Dorothy FRIENDS, Chief Dietician; David Garraghty, Warden;
Leon Williams, Food Service Manager; James
Wheeler; David Williams, Defendants Appellees.

No. 92-6874.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.

Submitted: January 4, 1994.
Decided: May 18, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, District Judge. (CA-92-54-R, CA-92-167-R)

Willie X Brown, James X Ervin, Winfred X. Fletcher, Calvin E. X Gay, James 3X Prince, Jerome X Richardson, Johnathan Lee X, Appellants Pro Se.

Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, Reneen Evat Hewlett, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellees.

E.D.Va.

AFFIRMED.

Before HALL, WILKINS, and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:

Appellants appeal from the district court's order denying relief on their 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 (1988) complaints. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Batts, Nos. CA-92-54-R, CA-92-167-R (E.D. Va. July 8, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

25 F.3d 1038, 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 20781, 1994 WL 197010, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-friends-ca4-1994.