Brown v. Ford

866 So. 2d 189, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1836, 2004 WL 314967
CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida
DecidedFebruary 20, 2004
DocketNo. 1D03-5475
StatusPublished

This text of 866 So. 2d 189 (Brown v. Ford) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Ford, 866 So. 2d 189, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1836, 2004 WL 314967 (Fla. Ct. App. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Upon consideration of the appellants’ response to the Court’s order of January 8, 2004, the Court has determined that the notice of appeal was prematurely filed. See generally Hoffman v. O’Connor, 802 So.2d 1197 (Fla. 1st DCA 2002)(holding that reservation of jurisdiction over non-collateral issue renders an order nonfinal). Specifically, the lower tribunal’s reservation of jurisdiction to determine collateral source set-offs, a non-collateral matter, interferes with the finality of the judgment. Accordingly, the appeal is hereby dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

KAHN, BENTON and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., CONCUR.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Hoffman v. O'CONNOR
802 So. 2d 1197 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
866 So. 2d 189, 2004 Fla. App. LEXIS 1836, 2004 WL 314967, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-ford-fladistctapp-2004.