Brown v. Florida Parole Commission

724 So. 2d 609, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15847, 1998 WL 874832
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. Florida Parole Commission. Read the opinion of the Court — 2000 Fla. App. LEXIS 8444
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided December 17, 1998·No. No. 97-4336·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Petitioner seeks review of an order of the circuit court denying his petition for writ of mandamus. Among his arguments, petitioner alleged that in setting his presumptive parole release date after a parole revocation, the Florida Parole Commission violated ex post facto prohibitions in utilizing statutory and rule amendments enacted after petitioner committed the crimes involved in his original incarceration. We treat the request for review as a petition for writ of certiorari. See Sheley v. Florida Parole Commission, 720 So.2d 216 (Fla.1998). We conclude the petitioner was accorded due process, and the circuit court applied the correct law.

Accordingly, we deny the petition for writ of certiorari.

JOANOS, KAHN and DAVIS, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Florida Parole Commission, 724 So. 2d 609, 1998 Fla. App. LEXIS 15847, 1998 WL 874832 (Fla. Ct. App. 1998).

724 So. 2d 609 (Brown v. Florida Parole Commission) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Sheley v. Florida Parole Com'n
720 So. 2d 216 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1998)