Brown v. Fischer

148 A.D.3d 1383, 48 N.Y.S.3d 635
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided March 16, 2017·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 (transferred to this Court by order of the Supreme Court, entered in Albany County) to review a determination of respondent finding petitioner guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules.

[1384] Petitioner commenced this CPLR article 78 proceeding to challenge a tier III disciplinary determination finding him guilty of violating certain prison disciplinary rules. The Attorney General has advised this Court that the determination has been administratively reversed, all references thereto have been expunged from petitioner’s institutional record and the mandatory $5 surcharge has been refunded to petitioner’s inmate account. We note that the loss of good time incurred by petitioner as a result of the disciplinary determination also should be restored (see Matter of Lawrence v Annucci, 141 AD3d 1063, 1063 [2016]). In view of this, and given that petitioner has been granted all the relief to which he is entitled, the petition must be dismissed as moot (see Matter of Kirshtein v New York State Dept. of Corr. & Community Supervision, 142 AD3d 1246, 1246 [2016]).

Egan Jr., J.P., Lynch, Rose, Clark and Mulvey, JJ., concur.

Adjudged that the petition is dismissed, as moot, without costs.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Fischer, 148 A.D.3d 1383, 48 N.Y.S.3d 635 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2017).

148 A.D.3d 1383 (Brown v. Fischer) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Matter of Dudley v. Annucci
2019 NY Slip Op 656 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)
Matter of Chavez v. Annucci
2019 NY Slip Op 654 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2019)