Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided February 2, 2011·No. 10-6238·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6238

BRADLEY CARL BROWN,

Plaintiff – Appellant,

v.

FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS; HARLEY G. LAPPIN, Warden; AL HAYNES, Warden; D. E. GILL, Associate Warden; HAROLD TAYLOR, Associate Warden; V. DUPUIS, S.I.S. Lieutenant; D. MURPHY, Lieutenant,

Defendants – Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Wheeling. Frederick P. Stamp, Jr., Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-00083-FPS-JES)

Submitted: January 12, 2011 Decided: February 2, 2011

Before DUNCAN, AGEE, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Bradley Carl Brown, Appellant Pro Se. Daniel W. Dickinson, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Wheeling, West Virginia, for Appellees.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Bradley Carl Brown appeals the district court’s order

accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying

relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown

Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388 (1971).

We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.

Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district

court. Brown v. Fed. Bureau of Prisons, No. 5:08-cv-00083-FPS-

JES (N.D. W. Va. Dec. 17, 2009). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons, (4th Cir. 2011).

Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons (Brown v. Federal Bureau of Prisons) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related