Brown v. Farmers Insurance Exchange

112 F. App'x 998
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedNovember 22, 2004
Docket04-50477
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 112 F. App'x 998 (Brown v. Farmers Insurance Exchange) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Farmers Insurance Exchange, 112 F. App'x 998 (5th Cir. 2004).

Opinion

PER CURIAM: *

Plaintiff, Sharon Mack Brown, sued the defendant, Farmers Insurance Exchange, her employer, alleging race discrimination and retaliation under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 200e et seq. Plaintiffs principal claims revolved around the failure of her employer to grant certain promotions because of her race for which she had applied and for which she felt she was qualified. Defendant answered and alleged various nondiscriminatory reasons for not granting the promotions Plaintiff sought. After adequate discovery, Defendant moved for *999 summary judgment and the district court granted the motion. Plaintiff appeals.

We have carefully reviewed the briefs, record excerpts and relevant portions of the record itself, and for the reasons stated by the district court in its Order filed May 3, 2004, we affirm the grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendant.

AFFIRMED.

*

Pursuant to 5th Cir. R. 47.5, the Court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5th Cir. R. 47.5.4.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McCullough v. Xerox Corp.
942 F. Supp. 2d 380 (W.D. New York, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
112 F. App'x 998, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-farmers-insurance-exchange-ca5-2004.