Brown v. Fairbank

538 F. App'x 299
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 23, 2013
DocketNo. 13-1257
StatusPublished

This text of 538 F. App'x 299 (Brown v. Fairbank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Brown v. Fairbank, 538 F. App'x 299 (4th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jerome Julius Brown, Sr. seeks to appeal the magistrate judge’s order denying his motion. The district court previously dismissed his proposed complaint without prejudice. This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (2006), and certain interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292 (2006); Fed.R.Civ.P. 54(b); Cohen v. Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46, 69 S.Ct. 1221, 93 L.Ed. 1528 (1949). The order Brown seeks to appeal is neither a final order nor an appealable interlocutory or collateral order. Accordingly, we deny leave to proceed in forma pauperis and dismiss the appeal for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cohen v. Beneficial Industrial Loan Corp.
337 U.S. 541 (Supreme Court, 1949)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
538 F. App'x 299, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-fairbank-ca4-2013.