Brown v. Ellis

672 S.E.2d 24, 2009 WL 137339

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Brown v. Ellis. Read the opinion of the Court — 363 N.C. 360 →

Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 6, 2009·No. 389PA07·Published

Opinion

672 S.E.2d 24 (2009)

William L. BROWN
v.
Mark P. ELLIS.

No. 389PA07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 6, 2009.

Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Brown.

T. Keith Black, William F. Patterson, Jr., Greensboro, for Ellis.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of January 2009 by Plaintiff for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Denied. By order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of January 2009."

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

672 S.E.2d 24 (2009)

William L. BROWN
v.
Mark P. ELLIS.

No. 389PA07.

Supreme Court of North Carolina.

January 6, 2009.

Tobias S. Hampson, Raleigh, Lee M. Cecil, High Point, for Brown.

T. Keith Black, William F. Patterson, Jr., Greensboro, for Ellis.

The following order has been entered on the motion filed on the 2nd day of January 2009 by Plaintiff for Extension of Time to File Brief:

"Motion Denied. By order of the Court in conference this the 6th day of January 2009."

Brown v. Ellis, 672 S.E.2d 24, 2009 WL 137339 (N.C. 2009).

Pincite

672 S.E.2d 24 (Brown v. Ellis) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.