Brown v. Einbinder
6 A.D.2d 1040, 178 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4501
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 28, 1958
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 6 A.D.2d 1040 (Brown v. Einbinder) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Brown v. Einbinder, 6 A.D.2d 1040, 178 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4501 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to third-party plaintiff-respondent against third-party defendant-appellant. The exclusion of the prior inconsistent statement was improper but on the whole record the exclusion was not prejudicial. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Rosen-Michaels, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
129 A.D.2d 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
6 A.D.2d 1040, 178 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4501, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/brown-v-einbinder-nyappdiv-1958.