Brown v. Einbinder
6 A.D.2d 1040, 178 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4501
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 28, 1958·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
Judgment unanimously affirmed, with costs to third-party plaintiff-respondent against third-party defendant-appellant. The exclusion of the prior inconsistent statement was improper but on the whole record the exclusion was not prejudicial. Concur — Breitel, J. P., Rabin, M. M. Frank, McNally and Stevens, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Brown v. Einbinder, 6 A.D.2d 1040, 178 N.Y.S.2d 1021, 1958 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4501 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1958).
6 A.D.2d 1040 (Brown v. Einbinder) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Rosen-Michaels, Inc. v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.
129 A.D.2d 871 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1987)